Band of Marauders
Rebecca Potts
22 year old Texan, living ...

I like breakfast, television and theorizing about the apocalypse.
HOME
ASK
Movie Reviews
Quote Things
Lady Business
End of line
THEME

Thoughts On Girls

Lena Dunham’s new television show Girls lit a fire underneath the internet that has yet to be quelled. It’s a bit strange how the whole phenomenon happened, at least for me—and I feel that I have the right to make this particular review more me-centric since this tendency towards self-presentation has been the nature of much of the praise and criticism that surrounds the show. I was sitting in a Double Tree hotel room, lovingly procured for me by my mother who had just been confronted by the full wrath of my thesis induced panic attack, trying to get a handle on my work and my irrational despair, when I stumbled across an article on Girls. Having attended a screening of Dunham’s film Tiny Furniture while visiting a friend in New York, I decided to check it out.I watched the trailer and was suddenly filled with an overwhelming sense of connection and well-being. I am not alone! My struggles are understood! Yes my white, upper-middleclass, twenty-something female angst stems from a place of privilege and elite education, but does this fact or even my acknowledgement of this fact make my pain any less real or valid?

            Girls’ answer to this question is yes and no.

Read More

Hunger Games Review

The Hunger Games movie is taking some shit right now in the reviews for tragically misguided readings of the text. Disclaimer: I have read all the books and loved them deeply, so I do not know how to approach this movie from the perspective of someone who has not yet succumb. Not my problem, READ THEM! Yes the camera was too shaky, yes the costumes were sub par and YES we obvi needed more grinding-on Peta-in-a-cave-for-soup action, but there were so many other excellent aspects of this movie that far outstrip any such trivial difficulties.

Read More

Friends with Kids Review
I really, really, really wanted to like this movie. Kristen Wiig! Maya Rudolph! Jon Hamm! Adam Scott! All of the actors from my favorite television shows and a Bridesmaids reunion to boot! Alas, the magic of Bridesmaids was missing from start to finish of this cloying, sweet and ultimately vacant film. From the way Scott’s character, Jason, refers to Julie (Jennifer Westfeldt) as “doll” upwards of fifteen times in the first five minutes (seriously, unless you’re Humphrey Bogart and it’s the 1940s you probably can’t pull this off) to the stilted dialogue, this movie fell flat on its overproduced, under-inspired face.
            In Friends with Kids, Jason and Julie have been platonic friends since college along with two romantic couples: Leslie (Rudolph) and Alex (Chris O’Dowd); Missy (Wiig) and Ben (Hamm). The six of them are living the dream in Manhattan until the couples start having babies. Flash forward four years (time moves in very strange jumps and starts throughout this movie) and Jason and Julie feel unable to connect with their friends who are constantly fighting as a result of baby stress. Jason and Julie then decide to have a baby together, split the work and continue to date in search of The One. Post-baby, they both meet caricatures of heterosexual perfection—Megan Fox plays the sexy, young, dancer who kicks ass at video games and doesn’t want kids, while Edward Burns plays the ruggedly handsome manly man who is great with children and housework. But SURPRISE! Jason and Julie are actually in love with each other! WTF right!?! Yay innovation in romcoms.
            The ending is expected, unoriginal and cliché (much like this sentence), but duh, so what? I did not go to see this movie wanting to be shocked or mystified or confused. I did, however, hope to be entertained and delighted. Though the plot could really only end one way, Friends with Kids should have at least made me excited to get there. The only couple I found even slightly compelling was Leslie and Alex, but they received far too little airtime as most of the movie was spent watching Julie make sad deer eyes at everyone in her Banana Republic sweaters.
             I should possibly give the film a bit of a break because it might easily have been intended for an older, sadder crowd full of baby-feelings who totally get it and think all of the boring, sad and bitter things everyone says are super true to late thirties existence. (Bleak!) Maybe I am so entrenched within the self-entitled narcissism of my 18 to 25 year old demographic that I cannot find value in anything outside of my market niche. But I REALLY hope this is not the case. As I prepare for graduation, I cling to my belief that college will not be the last place to have friends or sex.
            Speaking of sex, Friends with Kids takes a ridiculously antiquated and somewhat reactionary view of said pursuits. Of the three main couples only Missy and Ben seem to have sex. Missy and Ben are also the couple that starts hating each other and split up dramatically. Leslie and Alex have an explicitly lack luster love life and Julie and Jason only have sex with each other once for the direct purpose of creating a kid. The movie felt something like a PSA about how sex is the least important part of a loving relationship, that it should be the last piece of the puzzle, deployed only as a signifier of what two people already know, not a building block of any strong relationship.
            But back to the entire premise of the film: kids! As quaint as the idea of replacing “Friends with Benefits” with “Friends with Kids” seems, it reflects an unsettling attitude towards both. Joe, the child that serves as the catalyst for all the action, becomes little more than decorative set piece occasionally demonstrating how right Jason and Julie are for each other because they both look so cute with him. Why the hell do they even want a kid?! Because they are fundamentally boring people who need something to fill the hours they used to spend with their friends? Basically, yes.
For all of this movie’s flaws, my biggest critique is the simultaneous tedium and terror I felt while watching it. Tedium because Julie and Jason are such uninteresting, two dimensional characters (a game of “would you rather” and a boob obsession does not a nuanced character make), and terror because I hope desperately to never, ever relate to this pre-midlife crisis ethos. Also, I love Adam Scott, but he cannot pull off calling people “doll” or dating Megan Fox. (Knope 2012!)
My Week with Marilyn serves as a painful reminder that films like The Artist and actresses like Marilyn Monroe are few and far between, and that audiences are too often treated to over-budgeted, aggrandized E! True Hollywood Story-style flicks instead. Where The Artist’sportrayal of an actor’s struggle with fame and public image speaks to the struggles and triumphs within us all, My Week with Marilyn’s parallel subject matter caters to Keeping Up with the Kardashians-esque schadenfreude.  
The story behind My Week with Marilyn is told by Colin Clark (Eddie Redmayne), a 23-year-old film lover from an aggressively bookish British family. He travels to London to work as the third assistant director for the film The Prince and the Showgirl, starring Monroe (Michelle Williams) and Sir Laurence Olivier (Kenneth Branagh). Clark meets and falls in love with Monroe, who is, at this moment, meteorically famous, 30 years old and at the beginning of her third marriage to Arthur Miller. The rest of the film is spent watching Marilyn break down while Clark makes puppy-dog eyes at her and tells her how special and misunderstood she is. He is portrayed as the lifeline tethering her to this reality, without whom she would never have had the courage to finish the The Prince and the Showgirl. (What?! Why does this film keep insisting that Monroe is too scared and nervous to act? She’d been shaking it for the camera for years at this point. I chalk it up to Clark’s desire to see Monroe as someone intimidated by England and high art whom he could, therefore, lord over). 
The film is 99 minutes of Monroe hissy fits that serve to align the spectator with Clark’s image of Marilyn as a poor, misunderstood child, but certainly not to entertain. This is the woman who exploited the confused sexuality of the 1950s for copious amounts of cash. She seduced the President, the U.S. Attorney General and one of America’s best playwrights. She formed her own production studio and worked against nuclear proliferation, segregation and McCarthyism. Monroe was no weak child who could not understand her effect. She got it. It is we who continue to misunderstand.
I do not wish to deride Michelle Williams—she was a great Jen for Dawson’s Creekand Alma for Brokeback Mountain—but her attempt to portray Monroe only highlights the film’s failure to comprehend the icon’s allure. My Week with Marilyn reduces Monroe to drugs, blond hair and boobs. Everyone in this movie is constantly remarking upon her irresistible and electrifying presence, and yet this indescribable charisma—tangible within the first seconds of a grainy YouTube clip of the real Marilyn—never materializes in Williams. We keep looking for Marilyn in Williams and yet all that appears is a mascara-streaked child, caught playing dress-up with her mother’s pearls. Williams is not alone in her inability to embody the Hollywood legends of the ’40s and ’50s. Julia Ormond as Vivien Leigh and Branagh as Olivier, though not at all bad, visibly illustrate the difference between an actor and a legend.
Unsurprisingly, the film is based on real-life Clark’s account of his time with her. Clark casts himself as the quintessential “nice guy” whom Monroe would totally be with if she knew what was best for her. But, as the film assures us time and time again, she cannot take care of herself, does not know her own mind and cannot handle her own success. Maybe some day we’ll get to see a movie about a woman who is successful without being haunted by all the home-cooked meals she never prepared for her husband.

My Review of The Artist

The Artist is a film (and I use the term “film” deliberately) about the Hollywood of our collective fantasies, the ideal Hollywood, the dream factory—a place that does not and never has existed, but that, nonetheless, we all recognize. The Artist is simultaneously tragic and hopeful, clever and sincere, exaggerated and understated, deadly serious and delightfully goofy. It is filmmaking pared down to its essential elements, arriving at its loftiest peaks. The Artist stands out among its Oscar rivals as a reminder of why people love going to the movies. Good cinema moves us to laugh and cry in unison with other audience members—strangers, except for in those brief moments—reacting at a visceral level to the drama unfolding on screen.

Read More